Why Windows 8 is going to be another Vista, but without the fail
Friday, April 27, 2012 at 10:28AM 
For years now Windows Vista has been the butt of a lot of technology jokes. More so than previous editions of Windows, Vista required a significant boost in power to run properly. Yeah, you could run it without the shiny glass and 3D effects, but most people either did not know that or really wanted the eye-candy. Who doesn’t though? Most people like shiny things, that’s why we buy things like sports cars, diamonds, and Apple products. That being said, for over four years Microsoft sold millions and millions of copies of Windows Vista on new PCs despite it being declared as a “failure” because so few people were upgrading to it. Why was this case?
I believe that Windows 8, like Windows Vista, is going to require another significant hardware shift in order to get the most out of it. Even though, from my experience, it runs smoother than even Windows 7 on legacy hardware (A Dell Studio 15 and Macbook Pro in my case) I think that it will be most successful with buyers of new hardware that have touch screens, cameras capable of motion/voice control, and multi-touch trackpads/screens. I think like Windows XP, Windows 7 is a very solid version of Windows and an excellent piece of software. I believe that most businesses and people with current machines will simply not see a reason to upgrade to Windows 8 because Windows 7 just works well enough right now. I do not think it means that Windows 8 will fail though.
My expectations on how this thing will play out:
Microsoft and partners will release a number of Windows 8 devices: tablets, laptops, desktops, convertible tablet/laptop hybrids, and more. I think Metro will really appeal to people on these new devices and granted the experience is good enough at launch, perhaps people will opt to buy a Windows 8 tablet or other device. I think the Windows 8 Metro experience will be very much like the iPad-Mac experience in which people use Metro for enjoyable activities like Facebook, Twitter, internet, games, multimedia, etc. and traditional Windows 7 desktop for getting work done or heavy lifting operations like professional work (AutoCad, movie production, coding, etc.). Mostly I expect those who upgrade from Windows 7 to Windows 8 on traditional hardware will do it because they have come to love the Metro experience and want a consistent experience from their tablet to their traditional hardware. People love consistency and that is why people who own iPhones are more likely to consider an iPad. That’s one of the things that makes Apple’s ecosystem so appealing is that things just work toether. Metro will eventually evolve like the iPad to do more professional-level tasks, but even today the newest iPad is awkward in areas like photo manipulation (iPhoto comes to mind), video creation (iMovie is okay, but not great for big project), and writing complex documents (Sorry, iWork doesn’t cut it right now).
As for businesses they will probably skip Windows 8 entirely and use Windows 7 because it is such as solid release. Most businesses today do not have tablet hardware or touchscreens or even internal webcams if I had to guess. I can see Metro UI working great in a business, they generally like to stick with what works and Windows 7 works fantastic with the technology most have right now. Because of this I can already foresee in my crystal ball of tech that hipsters, tech pundits, and opposing fanboys alike will declare Windows 8 a “failure” because people will not simply upgrade to it in droves.
I think it will be like Vista in that regard, that people will not upgrade to it directly, but rather wait until they get a new device to get it. That’s why I do not feel that legacy support on Windows 8 makes the experience “impure” or broken as some would lead you to believe. You could buy a Windows 8 tablet and literally never know that the desktop exits, but I think the inclusion is nice for legacy devices and people who need a more a more traditional version of Office to work with in a pinch. As much as I love my iPad, iWork for the iPad is currently not enough for the papers I write for my engineering classes in college. Having the full, desktop edition of iWork or Microsoft Office is simply superior at this point. There are several times a week that a mobile version of iWork is simply not powerful enough for the stuff I typically do for school. I look at having the desktop UI on a tablet as the same thing when people use VLC on their iPad to remote into their Macs or PCs. Not ideal, but a really handy feature to hold me over until the platform matures. If you use Windows 8 or Windows Phone for any extended period of time it’s clear that Microsoft feels its future is Metro all the way, the legacy support is just there to tide people over until the platform matures, much like the iPad initially touted that it iPhones apps or a gaming console like the PS3 having the ability to play PS2 games. Eventually those using the legacy software will die off. You can see this with the iPad and how Apple does not promote the use of iPhone apps anymore and the current Playstation 3 that does not even play Playstation 2 games. In short, Microsoft’s future is Metro, but legacy support is there to drag people into that future.
I think that Windows 8 will be fine and if Microsoft pushes Metro in the way they are currently pushing Windows Phone 7 and put the entire force of the company behind Windows 8 they can make it a success. Reimagining the most successful piece of software of all time is a difficult task and they may not be able to do it. I have just learned to never underestimate Microsoft, especially when they are backed into a wall. Many did not think they could get into video games and now they have one of the most beloved and successful gaming consoles of all time, the Xbox 360. That and many did not think they could recover from Vista, but Windows 7 is arguably the best version of Windows they have ever released and is selling like hotcakes. I think a unified Microsoft is a powerful and awesome force in technology. I look forward to what seeing what they can do in the post-PC era.



